California’s Looming Tax Hike: An Existential Threat to the Cannabis Industry

February 12, 2025

California’s Looming Tax Hike: An Existential Threat to the Cannabis Industry

California, the largest cannabis market in the U.S., is once again at the center of a heated debate regarding its tax policies for the cannabis industry. While the state was once viewed as a progressive leader in cannabis legalization, its high tax rates have caused significant concern among industry stakeholders, and a proposed 25% tax hike could push the state’s legal cannabis market into a crisis. This blog post will explore the proposed tax increase, its potential implications on the cannabis market, and why it could be an existential threat to California’s legal cannabis industry.

1. The Current Tax Structure in California’s Cannabis Industry

California’s cannabis market, which became legal for adult use in 2018, is built on a multi-layered tax system that applies to every step of the supply chain. Here’s a breakdown of the current tax structure:

Excise Tax: Cannabis consumers are currently subject to a 15% excise tax when they purchase cannabis products from legal dispensaries. This tax is applied to the retail price of cannabis goods.
Sales Tax: Cannabis businesses are also subject to California’s general sales tax of 7.25%, with localities able to add additional taxes on top of this state rate.
Cultivation Tax: Cannabis cultivators are taxed on the amount of cannabis they grow. In 2024, the cultivation tax was $9.65 per ounce of flower and $2.87 per ounce of leaves.

The state has justified these taxes by arguing that the revenue is needed for public health initiatives, law enforcement, and to ensure that the legal cannabis market can continue to grow and thrive. However, many industry experts have argued that these high tax rates have led to unintended consequences, particularly for smaller businesses and consumers.

2. The Proposed 25% Tax Hike: An Overview

In response to the ongoing budgetary challenges, California has proposed a 25% increase in cannabis taxes. The new tax plan, if implemented, would drastically raise the taxes on both cannabis products and cultivation. Although the exact timeline for the tax hike is uncertain, it has already generated widespread concern within the industry.

This proposed tax hike would consist of two major changes:

Increased Excise Tax: The excise tax, which is currently set at 15%, could be raised to 25%, substantially increasing the price of legal cannabis products for consumers.
Higher Cultivation Taxes: Cultivation taxes would also increase in proportion to the overall tax hike, pushing the cost of growing cannabis even higher for producers.

The California government justifies this increase by citing growing state revenue needs, including the push for funding education, public safety, and drug prevention programs. The state’s budget deficit has led to a proposal to raise taxes across various sectors, and cannabis has not been spared.

3. The Economic Impact on California’s Legal Cannabis Market

California’s legal cannabis market is worth billions of dollars, but it’s also struggling with several significant issues. The proposed 25% tax hike could have a profound economic impact on the industry. Here’s how:

a. Rising Prices for Consumers

One of the most immediate effects of the tax increase will be on consumers. Cannabis prices in California are already higher than in many other states due to the current tax structure. A 25% increase in taxes would likely result in even higher retail prices for cannabis products, which could push consumers back to the illicit market, where taxes do not apply.

California’s legal cannabis market faces an ongoing battle with the black market, which still accounts for a substantial portion of cannabis sales in the state. Many consumers are driven to purchase from illegal sources because prices are lower and products are less regulated. Raising taxes could exacerbate this issue, making legal cannabis less attractive to price-sensitive consumers.

b. Increased Pressure on Cannabis Producers

The cultivation tax is another major area of concern. Cultivators are already facing steep competition and rising costs. The proposed 25% tax increase on cultivation would add an additional burden on producers, especially small-scale growers. These higher costs could lead to reduced profit margins, making it difficult for smaller businesses to survive.

In addition, the increase in cultivation taxes may lead to fewer cultivators in the legal market. Many growers may choose to exit the market or move to the black market to avoid the higher taxes. As cultivation costs rise, it could also lead to a consolidation of the industry, with larger, more well-funded companies absorbing the smaller players.

c. Job Losses and Business Closures

As taxes increase, the cost of doing business in the cannabis sector will rise. This could result in widespread layoffs or even business closures, particularly among small and mid-sized cannabis companies that are already struggling with high taxes, regulatory hurdles, and competition from the black market. It could also make it harder for new cannabis businesses to enter the market, as the financial barriers to entry would become even higher.

With thousands of jobs tied to the cannabis industry, the potential for job losses would have a ripple effect throughout the state’s economy. Workers in cultivation, distribution, retail, and other sectors of the cannabis industry could face layoffs, leading to increased unemployment and economic hardship.

4. The Black Market vs. Legal Market: A Growing Divide

One of the biggest issues California faces with its high cannabis taxes is the competition between the legal and illegal markets. The state’s black market remains highly active, despite the legalization of cannabis for recreational use. The illegal market continues to operate outside of the tax system, allowing black market dealers to offer cannabis products at a much lower price.

The proposed tax hike could exacerbate this divide. With prices for legal cannabis rising due to the tax increases, more consumers may choose to purchase cannabis from illegal sources, where prices are lower and there are no taxes. This could undermine the progress made in creating a legal and regulated cannabis market and further fuel the black market.

The California cannabis industry’s struggle with the black market is one of its most pressing challenges, and the proposed tax hike could make it even more difficult for the legal market to compete.

5. The Impact on Social Equity Programs

California’s cannabis market was designed to prioritize social equity, with policies aimed at helping communities most affected by the War on Drugs. These programs include grants, loans, and assistance for cannabis businesses owned by individuals from these communities. However, these programs have struggled to gain traction due to the high cost of doing business and the burdens imposed by the state’s taxes.

The proposed tax hike could further jeopardize these social equity programs by making it even harder for social equity applicants to enter the market or maintain a profitable business. The increased tax burden could push these businesses into financial distress, preventing them from thriving and ultimately undermining the goal of promoting diversity within the cannabis industry.

6. Industry Advocacy and the Call for Tax Reform

In response to the proposed tax hike, many cannabis industry advocates have voiced their concerns. Leading organizations, including the California Cannabis Industry Association (CCIA), have called on state lawmakers to reconsider the tax increase and instead focus on creating a more sustainable tax system that supports both businesses and consumers.

Industry advocates argue that tax reform is necessary to ensure the long-term success of California’s cannabis market. They suggest that reducing the overall tax burden, simplifying the tax structure, and implementing measures to reduce illegal market competition could help create a more balanced and prosperous cannabis industry in California.

There is also a growing call for tax relief for small businesses, which are disproportionately affected by high taxes. Smaller cannabis operators argue that they are at a disadvantage compared to larger corporations and that targeted tax relief could help them stay competitive.

7. What Can Be Done? Exploring Potential Solutions

To mitigate the potential negative impact of the proposed 25% tax hike, several strategies could be explored:

Gradual Tax Increases: Instead of an immediate 25% increase, a more gradual tax increase could allow businesses time to adjust and adapt to the changing tax landscape.
Tax Relief for Small Businesses: Providing tax credits or exemptions for smaller cannabis businesses could help ensure that they can continue operating in a highly competitive and taxed market.
Enhanced Enforcement Against the Black Market: Stronger enforcement efforts to reduce the illegal cannabis market could help ensure that legal businesses are able to compete on a level playing field.
Reevaluating the Excise Tax Rate: A reevaluation of the excise tax rate, particularly in light of ongoing market challenges, could prevent further financial strain on businesses and consumers.

California’s looming 25% tax hike threatens to undermine the progress made in the state’s legal cannabis market. By pushing prices higher, it could drive consumers back to the black market, harm small businesses, and derail the state’s efforts to promote social equity within the industry. While the state’s financial needs are real, a more balanced approach to taxation could ensure that California’s cannabis industry remains viable for years to come.

The cannabis industry, lawmakers, and advocates must work together to find a solution that protects both the economic interests of the state and the sustainability of its legal cannabis market. If California does not adjust its tax policies, it risks undoing much of the success it has achieved in creating a regulated and legal cannabis industry, putting the future of its market in jeopardy.

Back to blog